Deepseek costed barely $6m, look at GLM 4.6 built on top of deepseek, GLM is now used by cursor and even windsurf as best coding models. Technology is evolving too fast; your argument is 12 months old. You need to find something else.
I get why people are skeptical. Most crypto projects chase hype.
But Bittensor $TAO is different it’s aiming at a problem that’s about to define the decade.
We’re heading toward an AI monopoly that makes Big Tech look tame.
Right now:
Only 3–4 companies can train frontier models:
OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta.
Training costs are exploding.
GPT-4: $100M.
GPT-5: $1B.
By 2030, $10B+ runs.
That means only 2–3 entities.
Will control all meaningful AI.
And that’s where the real danger starts:
1. Corporate Alignment Problem
Google decides what’s “true.” No competition. No alternative viewpoints.
2. Innovation Gatekeeping
You want AI for research? Pay their price, follow their rules, accept their limits.
3. Data Slavery
We train their models for free, they own the value.
4. Single Points of Failure
One AWS outage. One regulator. And half the world’s AI goes dark.
Bittensor exists as infrastructure insurance. It doesn’t need to be perfectly decentralized just decentralized enough to:
• Prevent single-entity control
• Enable permissionless innovation
• Distribute value fairly
Think Linux vs Windows. Linux didn’t win the market, but it forced competition, powered critical infrastructure, and gave the world a real alternative.
Bittensor is the Linux of AI.
Real use cases are already emerging:
– Sovereign AI for nations too small to build their own.
– Specialized models Big Tech ignores.
– Uncensorable research.
– Economic participation for contributors GPUs, data, validation work paid in $TAO.
Without Bittensor by 2030:
– 2–3 companies own intelligence itself
– Prices rise
– Innovation is permissioned
– Nations get locked out
– “AI safety” becomes corporate policy
With Bittensor:
– Constant competition
– Open innovation
– Shared infrastructure
– Value flows to contributors
– Multiple safety approaches
$TAO it’s the coordination mechanism. No incentives, no network. No network, back to monopolies.
Bittensor might fail. It’s hard tech. But the alternative total corporate control of intelligence is worse.
The question isn’t “Will Bittensor beat Google?”
It’s “Do we really want to live in a world where Google has no competition?”
We’ve seen this movie before.
Oil. Banks. Big Tech.
This time, it’s intelligence itself.
And that’s why I think $TAO matters.
891
0
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。


