Deepseek costed barely $6m, look at GLM 4.6 built on top of deepseek, GLM is now used by cursor and even windsurf as best coding models. Technology is evolving too fast; your argument is 12 months old. You need to find something else.
I get why people are skeptical. Most crypto projects chase hype.
But Bittensor $TAO is different itâs aiming at a problem thatâs about to define the decade.
Weâre heading toward an AI monopoly that makes Big Tech look tame.
Right now:
Only 3â4 companies can train frontier models:
OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta.
Training costs are exploding.
GPT-4: $100M.
GPT-5: $1B.
By 2030, $10B+ runs.
That means only 2â3 entities.
Will control all meaningful AI.
And thatâs where the real danger starts:
1. Corporate Alignment Problem
Google decides whatâs âtrue.â No competition. No alternative viewpoints.
2. Innovation Gatekeeping
You want AI for research? Pay their price, follow their rules, accept their limits.
3. Data Slavery
We train their models for free, they own the value.
4. Single Points of Failure
One AWS outage. One regulator. And half the worldâs AI goes dark.
Bittensor exists as infrastructure insurance. It doesnât need to be perfectly decentralized just decentralized enough to:
âą Prevent single-entity control
âą Enable permissionless innovation
âą Distribute value fairly
Think Linux vs Windows. Linux didnât win the market, but it forced competition, powered critical infrastructure, and gave the world a real alternative.
Bittensor is the Linux of AI.
Real use cases are already emerging:
â Sovereign AI for nations too small to build their own.
â Specialized models Big Tech ignores.
â Uncensorable research.
â Economic participation for contributors GPUs, data, validation work paid in $TAO.
Without Bittensor by 2030:
â 2â3 companies own intelligence itself
â Prices rise
â Innovation is permissioned
â Nations get locked out
â âAI safetyâ becomes corporate policy
With Bittensor:
â Constant competition
â Open innovation
â Shared infrastructure
â Value flows to contributors
â Multiple safety approaches
$TAO itâs the coordination mechanism. No incentives, no network. No network, back to monopolies.
Bittensor might fail. Itâs hard tech. But the alternative total corporate control of intelligence is worse.
The question isnât âWill Bittensor beat Google?â
Itâs âDo we really want to live in a world where Google has no competition?â
Weâve seen this movie before.
Oil. Banks. Big Tech.
This time, itâs intelligence itself.
And thatâs why I think $TAO matters.
856
0
Der Inhalt dieser Seite wird von Drittparteien bereitgestellt. Sofern nicht anders angegeben, ist OKX nicht der Autor der zitierten Artikel und erhebt keinen Anspruch auf das Urheberrecht an den Materialien. Die Inhalte dienen ausschlieĂlich zu Informationszwecken und spiegeln nicht die Ansichten von OKX wider. Sie stellen keine Form der Empfehlung dar und sind weder als Anlageberatung noch als Aufforderung zum Kauf oder Verkauf digitaler Assets zu verstehen. Soweit generative KI zur Bereitstellung von Zusammenfassungen oder anderen Informationen eingesetzt wird, kann der dadurch erzeugte Inhalt ungenau oder widersprĂŒchlich sein. Mehr Infos findest du im verlinkten Artikel. OKX haftet nicht fĂŒr Inhalte, die auf Drittpartei-Websites gehostet werden. Digitale Assets, einschlieĂlich Stablecoins und NFT, bergen ein hohes Risiko und können stark schwanken. Du solltest sorgfĂ€ltig ĂŒberlegen, ob der Handel mit oder das Halten von digitalen Assets angesichts deiner finanziellen Situation fĂŒr dich geeignet ist.


