Deepseek costed barely $6m, look at GLM 4.6 built on top of deepseek, GLM is now used by cursor and even windsurf as best coding models. Technology is evolving too fast; your argument is 12 months old. You need to find something else.
I get why people are skeptical. Most crypto projects chase hype.
But Bittensor $TAO is different itâs aiming at a problem thatâs about to define the decade.
Weâre heading toward an AI monopoly that makes Big Tech look tame.
Right now:
Only 3â4 companies can train frontier models:
OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta.
Training costs are exploding.
GPT-4: $100M.
GPT-5: $1B.
By 2030, $10B+ runs.
That means only 2â3 entities.
Will control all meaningful AI.
And thatâs where the real danger starts:
1. Corporate Alignment Problem
Google decides whatâs âtrue.â No competition. No alternative viewpoints.
2. Innovation Gatekeeping
You want AI for research? Pay their price, follow their rules, accept their limits.
3. Data Slavery
We train their models for free, they own the value.
4. Single Points of Failure
One AWS outage. One regulator. And half the worldâs AI goes dark.
Bittensor exists as infrastructure insurance. It doesnât need to be perfectly decentralized just decentralized enough to:
âą Prevent single-entity control
âą Enable permissionless innovation
âą Distribute value fairly
Think Linux vs Windows. Linux didnât win the market, but it forced competition, powered critical infrastructure, and gave the world a real alternative.
Bittensor is the Linux of AI.
Real use cases are already emerging:
â Sovereign AI for nations too small to build their own.
â Specialized models Big Tech ignores.
â Uncensorable research.
â Economic participation for contributors GPUs, data, validation work paid in $TAO.
Without Bittensor by 2030:
â 2â3 companies own intelligence itself
â Prices rise
â Innovation is permissioned
â Nations get locked out
â âAI safetyâ becomes corporate policy
With Bittensor:
â Constant competition
â Open innovation
â Shared infrastructure
â Value flows to contributors
â Multiple safety approaches
$TAO itâs the coordination mechanism. No incentives, no network. No network, back to monopolies.
Bittensor might fail. Itâs hard tech. But the alternative total corporate control of intelligence is worse.
The question isnât âWill Bittensor beat Google?â
Itâs âDo we really want to live in a world where Google has no competition?â
Weâve seen this movie before.
Oil. Banks. Big Tech.
This time, itâs intelligence itself.
And thatâs why I think $TAO matters.
874
0
Le contenu de cette page est fourni par des tiers. Sauf indication contraire, OKX nâest pas lâauteur du ou des articles citĂ©s et ne revendique aucun droit dâauteur sur le contenu. Le contenu est fourni Ă titre dâinformation uniquement et ne reprĂ©sente pas les opinions dâOKX. Il ne sâagit pas dâune approbation de quelque nature que ce soit et ne doit pas ĂȘtre considĂ©rĂ© comme un conseil en investissement ou une sollicitation dâachat ou de vente dâactifs numĂ©riques. Dans la mesure oĂč lâIA gĂ©nĂ©rative est utilisĂ©e pour fournir des rĂ©sumĂ©s ou dâautres informations, ce contenu gĂ©nĂ©rĂ© par IA peut ĂȘtre inexact ou incohĂ©rent. Veuillez lire lâarticle associĂ© pour obtenir davantage de dĂ©tails et dâinformations. OKX nâest pas responsable du contenu hĂ©bergĂ© sur des sites tiers. La dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques, y compris les stablecoins et les NFT, implique un niveau de risque Ă©levĂ© et leur valeur peut considĂ©rablement fluctuer. Examinez soigneusement votre situation financiĂšre pour dĂ©terminer si le trading ou la dĂ©tention dâactifs numĂ©riques vous convient.


