🧐 BUYBACKS ON SOLANA: WHO’S REALLY REDUCING SUPPLY?
$DBR $MNDE $JUP $JTO $BONK $MPLX $RAY $PUMP $STREAM $ME $STEP
From Jupiter to Pumpfun, many projects announce “token buybacks” to redistribute value to holders.
But not every project actually burns tokens or creates a real supply reduction effect.
Some just buy tokens and hold them in the DAO treasury, or redistribute them to stakers. Let’s take a closer look at the landscape, summarized by @FabianoSolana:
1. deBridge – $DBR
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
So far, about 3% of total supply has been bought.
If the current pace continues, buybacks could equal nearly 20% of circulating supply in a year.
DAO will decide whether these tokens are burned or held in the treasury.
2. Marinade – $MNDE
50% of platform fees are allocated to buybacks.
Marinade generates around $170M in annual revenue, while MNDE’s FDV is roughly $140M (Fabiano might be off; CoinGecko lists FDV at $77M).
DAO will decide how to use the repurchased tokens in the future.
3. Jupiter – $JUP
50% of protocol fees go toward buying back JUP.
Bought tokens are sent to a “litterbox” (storage).
So far, @JupiterExchange has repurchased ~95M JUP, about 1.37% of total supply.
The community is discussing whether to burn or redistribute these tokens.
4. Jito – $JTO
1.5% of fees from the TipRouter system are used for periodic JTO buybacks, which are then burned.
At current prices, the estimated annual buyback is ~11M JTO, or 1.1% of total supply.
👉 One of the clearest examples of buyback + burn on Solana.
5. Bonk – $BONK
50% of fees from the LetsBONK platform are used to buy back and burn BONK.
The buyback + burn mechanism reduces actual supply.
6. Metaplex – $MPLX
50% of monthly revenue is used to buy back MPLX for the DAO.
In the last 30 days, Metaplex generated $1.56M in revenue and repurchased 3.5M MPLX (~0.3% of total supply).
Bought tokens are held under DAO management.
7. Raydium – $RAY
12% of trading fees are allocated to buybacks.
Total supply: 555M RAY, with only 1.9M new tokens issued annually.
This roughly equals 5% of circulating supply being repurchased each year.
8. Pumpfun – $PUMP
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
Average revenue exceeds $1M per day.
In September alone, Pumpfun spent $55M on buybacks. If sustained, this could repurchase over 30% of circulating supply in a year.
👉 Currently the largest buyback operation on Solana.
9. Streamflow – $STREAM
39% of revenue is used for buybacks and staker rewards.
Example: July 2025, 39% of $247K (~$96K) went to buybacks and staking rewards.
This model leans more toward buyback + reward than burning.
10. Magic Eden – $ME
Recently started a buyback program.
111K ME tokens have been repurchased and distributed to stakers.
Similar to Streamflow: tokens are bought to reward users rather than burned.
11. Step Finance – $STEP
100% of ecosystem revenue (including Solanafloor, Remora Markets, etc.) is used for buybacks.
5,26K
5
De inhoud op deze pagina wordt geleverd door derden. Tenzij anders vermeld, is OKX niet de auteur van het (de) geciteerde artikel(en) en claimt geen auteursrecht op de materialen. De inhoud is alleen bedoeld voor informatieve doeleinden en vertegenwoordigt niet de standpunten van OKX. Het is niet bedoeld als een goedkeuring van welke aard dan ook en mag niet worden beschouwd als beleggingsadvies of een uitnodiging tot het kopen of verkopen van digitale bezittingen. Voor zover generatieve AI wordt gebruikt om samenvattingen of andere informatie te verstrekken, kan deze door AI gegenereerde inhoud onnauwkeurig of inconsistent zijn. Lees het gelinkte artikel voor meer details en informatie. OKX is niet verantwoordelijk voor inhoud gehost op sites van een derde partij. Het bezitten van digitale activa, waaronder stablecoins en NFT's, brengt een hoge mate van risico met zich mee en de waarde van deze activa kan sterk fluctueren. Overweeg zorgvuldig of de handel in of het bezit van digitale activa geschikt voor je is in het licht van je financiële situatie.

