🧐 BUYBACKS ON SOLANA: WHO’S REALLY REDUCING SUPPLY?
$DBR $MNDE $JUP $JTO $BONK $MPLX $RAY $PUMP $STREAM $ME $STEP
From Jupiter to Pumpfun, many projects announce “token buybacks” to redistribute value to holders.
But not every project actually burns tokens or creates a real supply reduction effect.
Some just buy tokens and hold them in the DAO treasury, or redistribute them to stakers. Let’s take a closer look at the landscape, summarized by @FabianoSolana:
1. deBridge – $DBR
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
So far, about 3% of total supply has been bought.
If the current pace continues, buybacks could equal nearly 20% of circulating supply in a year.
DAO will decide whether these tokens are burned or held in the treasury.
2. Marinade – $MNDE
50% of platform fees are allocated to buybacks.
Marinade generates around $170M in annual revenue, while MNDE’s FDV is roughly $140M (Fabiano might be off; CoinGecko lists FDV at $77M).
DAO will decide how to use the repurchased tokens in the future.
3. Jupiter – $JUP
50% of protocol fees go toward buying back JUP.
Bought tokens are sent to a “litterbox” (storage).
So far, @JupiterExchange has repurchased ~95M JUP, about 1.37% of total supply.
The community is discussing whether to burn or redistribute these tokens.
4. Jito – $JTO
1.5% of fees from the TipRouter system are used for periodic JTO buybacks, which are then burned.
At current prices, the estimated annual buyback is ~11M JTO, or 1.1% of total supply.
👉 One of the clearest examples of buyback + burn on Solana.
5. Bonk – $BONK
50% of fees from the LetsBONK platform are used to buy back and burn BONK.
The buyback + burn mechanism reduces actual supply.
6. Metaplex – $MPLX
50% of monthly revenue is used to buy back MPLX for the DAO.
In the last 30 days, Metaplex generated $1.56M in revenue and repurchased 3.5M MPLX (~0.3% of total supply).
Bought tokens are held under DAO management.
7. Raydium – $RAY
12% of trading fees are allocated to buybacks.
Total supply: 555M RAY, with only 1.9M new tokens issued annually.
This roughly equals 5% of circulating supply being repurchased each year.
8. Pumpfun – $PUMP
100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens.
Average revenue exceeds $1M per day.
In September alone, Pumpfun spent $55M on buybacks. If sustained, this could repurchase over 30% of circulating supply in a year.
👉 Currently the largest buyback operation on Solana.
9. Streamflow – $STREAM
39% of revenue is used for buybacks and staker rewards.
Example: July 2025, 39% of $247K (~$96K) went to buybacks and staking rewards.
This model leans more toward buyback + reward than burning.
10. Magic Eden – $ME
Recently started a buyback program.
111K ME tokens have been repurchased and distributed to stakers.
Similar to Streamflow: tokens are bought to reward users rather than burned.
11. Step Finance – $STEP
100% of ecosystem revenue (including Solanafloor, Remora Markets, etc.) is used for buybacks.
4,28k
5
Innholdet på denne siden er levert av tredjeparter. Med mindre annet er oppgitt, er ikke OKX forfatteren av de siterte artikkelen(e) og krever ingen opphavsrett til materialet. Innholdet er kun gitt for informasjonsformål og representerer ikke synspunktene til OKX. Det er ikke ment å være en anbefaling av noe slag og bør ikke betraktes som investeringsråd eller en oppfordring om å kjøpe eller selge digitale aktiva. I den grad generativ AI brukes til å gi sammendrag eller annen informasjon, kan slikt AI-generert innhold være unøyaktig eller inkonsekvent. Vennligst les den koblede artikkelen for mer detaljer og informasjon. OKX er ikke ansvarlig for innhold som er vert på tredjeparts nettsteder. Beholdning av digitale aktiva, inkludert stablecoins og NFT-er, innebærer en høy grad av risiko og kan svinge mye. Du bør nøye vurdere om handel eller innehav av digitale aktiva passer for deg i lys av din økonomiske tilstand.

