🧐 BUYBACKS ON SOLANA: WHO’S REALLY REDUCING SUPPLY? $DBR $MNDE $JUP $JTO $BONK $MPLX $RAY $PUMP $STREAM $ME $STEP From Jupiter to Pumpfun, many projects announce “token buybacks” to redistribute value to holders. But not every project actually burns tokens or creates a real supply reduction effect. Some just buy tokens and hold them in the DAO treasury, or redistribute them to stakers. Let’s take a closer look at the landscape, summarized by @FabianoSolana: 1. deBridge – $DBR 100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens. So far, about 3% of total supply has been bought. If the current pace continues, buybacks could equal nearly 20% of circulating supply in a year. DAO will decide whether these tokens are burned or held in the treasury. 2. Marinade – $MNDE 50% of platform fees are allocated to buybacks. Marinade generates around $170M in annual revenue, while MNDE’s FDV is roughly $140M (Fabiano might be off; CoinGecko lists FDV at $77M). DAO will decide how to use the repurchased tokens in the future. 3. Jupiter – $JUP 50% of protocol fees go toward buying back JUP. Bought tokens are sent to a “litterbox” (storage). So far, @JupiterExchange has repurchased ~95M JUP, about 1.37% of total supply. The community is discussing whether to burn or redistribute these tokens. 4. Jito – $JTO 1.5% of fees from the TipRouter system are used for periodic JTO buybacks, which are then burned. At current prices, the estimated annual buyback is ~11M JTO, or 1.1% of total supply. 👉 One of the clearest examples of buyback + burn on Solana. 5. Bonk – $BONK 50% of fees from the LetsBONK platform are used to buy back and burn BONK. The buyback + burn mechanism reduces actual supply. 6. Metaplex – $MPLX 50% of monthly revenue is used to buy back MPLX for the DAO. In the last 30 days, Metaplex generated $1.56M in revenue and repurchased 3.5M MPLX (~0.3% of total supply). Bought tokens are held under DAO management. 7. Raydium – $RAY 12% of trading fees are allocated to buybacks. Total supply: 555M RAY, with only 1.9M new tokens issued annually. This roughly equals 5% of circulating supply being repurchased each year. 8. Pumpfun – $PUMP 100% of revenue is used to buy back tokens. Average revenue exceeds $1M per day. In September alone, Pumpfun spent $55M on buybacks. If sustained, this could repurchase over 30% of circulating supply in a year. 👉 Currently the largest buyback operation on Solana. 9. Streamflow – $STREAM 39% of revenue is used for buybacks and staker rewards. Example: July 2025, 39% of $247K (~$96K) went to buybacks and staking rewards. This model leans more toward buyback + reward than burning. 10. Magic Eden – $ME Recently started a buyback program. 111K ME tokens have been repurchased and distributed to stakers. Similar to Streamflow: tokens are bought to reward users rather than burned. 11. Step Finance – $STEP 100% of ecosystem revenue (including Solanafloor, Remora Markets, etc.) is used for buybacks.
4,22 t.
5
TÀllÀ sivulla nÀytettÀvÀ sisÀltö on kolmansien osapuolten tarjoamaa. Ellei toisin mainita, OKX ei ole lainatun artikkelin / lainattujen artikkelien kirjoittaja, eikÀ OKX vÀitÀ olevansa materiaalin tekijÀnoikeuksien haltija. SisÀltö on tarkoitettu vain tiedoksi, eikÀ se edusta OKX:n nÀkemyksiÀ. SitÀ ei ole tarkoitettu minkÀÀnlaiseksi suositukseksi, eikÀ sitÀ tule pitÀÀ sijoitusneuvontana tai kehotuksena ostaa tai myydÀ digitaalisia varoja. SiltÀ osin kuin yhteenvetojen tai muiden tietojen tuottamiseen kÀytetÀÀn generatiivista tekoÀlyÀ, tÀllainen tekoÀlyn tuottama sisÀltö voi olla epÀtarkkaa tai epÀjohdonmukaista. Lue aiheesta lisÀtietoa linkitetystÀ artikkelista. OKX ei ole vastuussa kolmansien osapuolten sivustojen sisÀllöstÀ. Digitaalisten varojen, kuten vakaakolikoiden ja NFT:iden, omistukseen liittyy suuri riski, ja niiden arvo voi vaihdella merkittÀvÀsti. Sinun tulee huolellisesti harkita, sopiiko digitaalisten varojen treidaus tai omistus sinulle taloudellisessa tilanteessasi.