Deepseek costed barely $6m, look at GLM 4.6 built on top of deepseek, GLM is now used by cursor and even windsurf as best coding models. Technology is evolving too fast; your argument is 12 months old. You need to find something else.
I get why people are skeptical. Most crypto projects chase hype. But Bittensor $TAO is different it’s aiming at a problem that’s about to define the decade. We’re heading toward an AI monopoly that makes Big Tech look tame. Right now: Only 3–4 companies can train frontier models: OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta. Training costs are exploding. GPT-4: $100M. GPT-5: $1B. By 2030, $10B+ runs. That means only 2–3 entities. Will control all meaningful AI. And that’s where the real danger starts: 1. Corporate Alignment Problem Google decides what’s “true.” No competition. No alternative viewpoints. 2. Innovation Gatekeeping You want AI for research? Pay their price, follow their rules, accept their limits. 3. Data Slavery We train their models for free, they own the value. 4. Single Points of Failure One AWS outage. One regulator. And half the world’s AI goes dark. Bittensor exists as infrastructure insurance. It doesn’t need to be perfectly decentralized just decentralized enough to: • Prevent single-entity control • Enable permissionless innovation • Distribute value fairly Think Linux vs Windows. Linux didn’t win the market, but it forced competition, powered critical infrastructure, and gave the world a real alternative. Bittensor is the Linux of AI. Real use cases are already emerging: – Sovereign AI for nations too small to build their own. – Specialized models Big Tech ignores. – Uncensorable research. – Economic participation for contributors GPUs, data, validation work paid in $TAO. Without Bittensor by 2030: – 2–3 companies own intelligence itself – Prices rise – Innovation is permissioned – Nations get locked out – “AI safety” becomes corporate policy With Bittensor: – Constant competition – Open innovation – Shared infrastructure – Value flows to contributors – Multiple safety approaches $TAO it’s the coordination mechanism. No incentives, no network. No network, back to monopolies. Bittensor might fail. It’s hard tech. But the alternative total corporate control of intelligence is worse. The question isn’t “Will Bittensor beat Google?” It’s “Do we really want to live in a world where Google has no competition?” We’ve seen this movie before. Oil. Banks. Big Tech. This time, it’s intelligence itself. And that’s why I think $TAO matters.
842
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。