Buybacks ≠ Buybacks A dozen projects on Solana are doing buybacks, but... > Who is doing 100% buybacks? > Who is burning the tokens after buybacks? Everything in this Solana Buyback Bible 🧵👇🏼
1) deBridge deBridge is using 100% of their revenue to buy back their own token. It is TBA what will happen with buybacks So far they bought back 3% of their supply. In one year, they would be able to buy back almost 20% of their circulating supply!
@debridge 2) Marinade Marinade allocates 50% of its fees to buy back MNDE every month Marinade has some of the highest annualized fees ($170M), which could be significant buying pressure on a $140M FDV token The future usecase of these buybacks will be decided by the DAO
@MarinadeFinance 3) Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of their protocol fees to buy back their own token They send buybacks to a litterbox. So far, Jupiter has bought back 95M JUP, which is 1.37% of their total supply There's a discussion what to do with buybacks tomorrow
should @JupiterExchange burn ~129,000,000 $JUP? this week, the DAO will decide on what to do with the current holdings of the @litterboxtrust details tomorrow, vote starts Thursday.
@JupiterExchange 4) Jito 1.5% of Jito's TipRouter fees will be dedicated to systematically purchasing JTO at regular intervals and burn it later At current market prices, this would result in over 11 million JTO tokens being bought and burned annually (1.1% of total supply)
@jito_sol 5) Bonk Bonk has different initiatives for buybacks + burn these tokens In this case, I will only refer to LetsBONK 50% of LetsBONK fees are used to purchase BONK tokens from the open market and burn them
@bonk_inu 6) Metaplex Every month, 50% of protocol revenue is allocated to MTPLX buybacks for the DAO In the last 30d they made $1.56M. 50% were used to buyback around 3.5M MPLX (over 0.3% of total supply) for the Metaplex DAO
@metaplex 7) Raydium Raydium has a very low token emission of just 1.9M token annually (555M total supply) Raydium allocates 12% of trading fees to buyback RAY tokens This results in 5% buybacks of the current circulating supply
8) Pump Fun Pump Fun is still making more than $1M revenue per day and they're using 100% of their revenue to buy back their token In September they bought back $55M worth of PUMP They could buy back more than 30% of their circulating supply in 1 year
@pumpdotfun 9) Streamflow 39% of protocol revenue is being used to buy and distribute STREAM to stakers With July ‘25 as an example, that would mean that 39% of $247,000 = $96,330 would go towards STREAM buybacks & reward distribution for just that month
2.95萬
272
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。