the chain abstraction thesis has seen validation in that the *quantity* of chains has continued to rise without much end in sight
but as zon correctly identifies, most of these chains don't actually produce anything of value, leaving users split between the same few apps on the same few chains
as interop and chain abstraction proliferates, alongside the drive for actual value creation in this space, the appchain thesis will prove itself
it's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem: you need adoption of chain abstraction to make appchains viable, but you need appchains to be used to get the full value out of chain abstraction, but I believe both of these things will grow in parallel
will take a few years and some mindset shifts in the industry but it will happen, 100%.
with so many chains having launched in the past 6 months and with many still yet to launch, it seems clear that we'll have infinite chains.
every one of these chains will use their token to incentive YOU (the builder) to generate value for THEM (the chain)
but as chains -> infinity, chain tokens tend to die faster.
it gets increasingly harder to believe the next sparkly chain with the same morpho, aave, pendle deployment is going to be the one that sticks.
certain chains with very unique value props (exchange related, not designed to be a gen purp chain, lindy, etc.) will be able to stand above the crowd but it'll only get tougher
instead, YOU (the builder) should opt to generate value for YOU instead
the best way to do that is by owning your stack and building an appchain while enabling users to deposit from trending pockets of liquidity
480
0
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.